Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454816›Full record

ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2026

Psychometric properties of the Positive Aspects of Caregiving Scale for unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia in the Brazilian context: a validation study.

Sofia Cristina Iost Pavarini, Aline Cristina Martins Gratão, Camila Rafael Ferreira Campos, Diana Quirino Monteiro, Elizabeth Joan Barham, Fabiana de Souza Orlandi, Gabriela Martins, Gustavo Carrijo Barbosa, Keila Cristianne Trindade da Cruz, Larissa Corrêa and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sofia Cristina Iost PavariniDepartment of Nursing, Department of Gerontology, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-8600
Aline Cristina Martins GratãoDepartment of Nursing, Department of Gerontology, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8508-0251
Camila Rafael Ferreira CamposUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8700-153X
Diana Quirino MonteiroUniversidade Católica de Brasília (UCB), Brasília (DF), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3130-4096
Elizabeth Joan BarhamDepartment of Psychology, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-4918
Fabiana de Souza OrlandiDepartment of Nursing, Department of Gerontology, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-6890
Gabriela MartinsDepartment of Gerontology, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-4763
Gustavo Carrijo BarbosaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-1227
Keila Cristianne Trindade da CruzDepartment of Nursing, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília (DF), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8146-8323
Larissa CorrêaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4596-4845
Luana Aparecida RochaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6707-4982
Ludmyla Caroline de Souza AlvesUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5507-702X
Ana Carolina OttavianiUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-4587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Positive Aspects of Caregiving Scale (PAC) assesses the satisfaction and psychosocial benefits perceived by caregivers in the caregiving experience.

objectiveTo analyze the psychometric properties of the PAC among unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia in the Brazilian context. DESIGN AND

settingValidation study of the instrument conducted online with caregivers from different regions of Brazil.

methodsThe sample comprised 100 unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia. Sociodemographic characteristics, positive aspects of caregiving, burden, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and quality of life were assessed using an online form. Evidence of validity based on internal structure was examined using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability testing, and criterion validity analysis.

resultsMost participants were women (95%), daughters of the care recipient (85%), with an average age of 54.5 years, a high educational level, and residence in the Southeast region of Brazil. Depressive symptoms (70%), anxiety (65%), moderate to severe burden (42%), and low quality of life (62%) were prevalent. Factor analysis indicated satisfactory fit for the PAC, and the high correlation between factors supported consideration of a one-dimensional scoring structure. The scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.89) and significant correlations with burden, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and quality of life.

conclusionThe PAC showed good psychometric properties in the Brazilian context, supporting its validity and reliability for assessing positive aspects of caregiving among unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyBrazilDepressionFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42454816
PMCPMC13360971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.