Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454763›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Pharmacological Practices Among Chilean University Students: Between Emotional Mediations, Performance Demands, and Health Mandates.

Angela Cifuentes, Juan Pablo Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angela CifuentesDepartment of Humanistic Studies, Federico Santa María Technical University, Valparaíso, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-9178
Juan Pablo PintoFaculty of Psychology, Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-1040

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 3260681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article examines the increasing use of psychotropic drugs among university students in Chile within a neoliberal academic context structured by performance demands, meritocratic imperatives and individualised forms of health management. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of 44 interviews conducted across three Chilean universities-two elite traditional institutions and one mass private university-we focus on 14 interviews in which psychotropic drug use emerged as a significant dimension of students' everyday lives. We conceptualise pharmacological practices as situated sociomaterial arrangements through which students regulate affect, sustain academic functionality and negotiate the demands of neoliberal university life. Within broader moral frameworks of healthism, three overlapping modalities emerge from our material: emotional mediations and performance-oriented use; medicated communities; and the body as interface. Together, these modalities reveal how psychotropic drugs reorganise the timing and intensity of distress, enabling forms of affective continuity and emotional self-regulation under conditions of accelerated academic life. Rather than constituting merely risk behaviours or cognitive enhancement practices, pharmacological practices emerge as technologies of affective and bodily adaptation embedded within Chile's neoliberal university system, where academic continuity frequently depends on the individualised management of distress structurally produced by the institution itself.

Indexed as

EmotionsPsychotropic DrugsStudentsAdultChileFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchUniversitiesYoung AdultPsychotropic Drugsemotional mediationshealthismmental healthpharmacological practicespsychotropic drugsuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID42454763
PMCPMC13371154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.