ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2026
Investigation of Ethylene Oxide Genotoxicity Dose-Response to Inform Cancer Risk Assessment.
Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ethylene oxide (EtO) is primarily used as an intermediate in the manufacture of chemicals, with a minor use as a sterilant for medical equipment and food products. It is a direct-acting alkylating agent that reacts with cellular macromolecules, including proteins and DNA. EtO has been shown to induce tumors in rodents and humans. DNA reactivity has been the postulated mode of action (MOA) for its carcinogenicity. The current study has investigated the dose response for EtO-induced genetic damage to inform the biological plausibility of a dose-response model for cancer risk assessment. Male and female B6C3F1 mice (≥ 10/sex/concentration) were exposed to 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 50, 100, or 200 ppm EtO by whole-body inhalation (6 h/day for 28 days, 7 days/week). Mutagenicity was assessed by determining the frequency of mutant Pig-a phenotype in reticulocytes (RET) and mature red blood cells (RBC) on Day 28. Cytogenetic damage was evaluated by the erythrocyte micronucleus (MN) test in blood samples collected on Days 5 and 28. EtO is a relatively weak genotoxicant with treatment-related increases in Pig-a and MN frequencies being seen primarily at 200 ppm. The hockey-stick shaped dose response for genetic damage may be conservatively interpreted as being no more than a linear response with a single slope. Thus, a cancer risk assessment dose-response model consisting of a single shallow linear slope throughout the exposure range is biologically plausible and consistent if EtO were acting through a mutagenic MoA for its carcinogenicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.