ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2026
AAVC: An automated framework for high-accuracy ACMG-based variant classification.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeClassification of DNA sequence data requires the implementation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) standards and guidelines. Therefore, automated tools have been developed. However, these tools often lack robust and up-to-date methodologies. This study reports on the development of a new tool and examines its performance for diagnostic and research purposes.
methodsThe automated ACMG-based variant classifier (AAVC) presented here computationally analyzes sequence variants following the ACMG guidelines, the Clinical Genome Resource specifications and a novel framework by leveraging large public databases and in silico prediction tools.
resultsAAVC demonstrated high concordance (94.39%) with the Food and Drug Administration recognized variant classifications, outperforming currently available tools. It classified 55% of the variants of uncertain significance in clinical variation into clinically significant categories. We identified, in the Turkish Variome, 215 novel pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or variants of uncertain significance high variants in the secondary finding genes and revealed that 1 in 10 individuals carried an actionable genotype.
conclusionAAVC constitutes a robust framework for the accurate classification of human germline sequence diversity is available at https://aavc.bilkent.edu.tr/, offering a highly accurate, rapid, and up-to-date platform for clinical laboratories and research groups to automatically interpret sequence variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.