Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454380›Full record

ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Nanomaterials Drive In Vivo CAR Immune Cells Engineering.

Meifen Luo, Kai Liao, Jinxi Chang, Junze Xie, Xing-Jie Liang, Qi Lei, Weisheng Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meifen LuoDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Kai LiaoDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Jinxi ChangThe First Clinical College, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Junze XieDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Xing-Jie LiangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Qi LeiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Weisheng GuoDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8064-357X

Funding

Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project 2024A03J0163Major Project of Guangzhou National Laboratory GZNL2024A03010National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFA1212500National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372128National Natural Science Foundation of China U23A20489Prevention and Control of Emerging and Major Infectious Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project 2026ZD01913005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immune cell therapy has emerged as a cornerstone of modern cell-based medicine, demonstrating potent clinical efficacy against a range of malignant tumors and autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, conventional ex vivo CAR immune cell manufacturing is hindered by complexity, high costs, and significant inter-individual variability, which have limited its broad clinical application. These bottlenecks have prompted a paradigm shift toward in vivo CAR engineering, wherein nanocarriers directly deliver genetic material to circulating or tissue-resident immune cells, substantially simplifying the production process. This review first outlines the evolution of CAR immune cell therapy and key limitations of ex vivo approaches and then examines major delivery platforms for in vivo approaches. Comparative analyses are presented across delivery efficiency, cellular tropism, and expression kinetics, with particular emphasis on delineating the mechanistic distinctions and application boundaries between transient and durable expression strategies. We further dissect the critical challenges, including receptor-mediated non-specific immune activation, nanocarrier-associated immunogenicity constraining repeated administration, and delivery barriers imposed by the solid tumor microenvironment. Finally, the intrinsic trade-off between therapeutic durability and biosafety across distinct delivery platforms is discussed, along with the necessity that their clinical translation hinges on systematic optimization of delivery precision, immune compatibility, and expression controllability.

Indexed as

Cell EngineeringImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNanostructuresReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR immune cellscell therapyclinical translationin vivo cell engineeringnanocarriers

Identifiers

PMID42454380
PMCPMC13486206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.