ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026
Nanomaterials Drive In Vivo CAR Immune Cells Engineering.
Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immune cell therapy has emerged as a cornerstone of modern cell-based medicine, demonstrating potent clinical efficacy against a range of malignant tumors and autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, conventional ex vivo CAR immune cell manufacturing is hindered by complexity, high costs, and significant inter-individual variability, which have limited its broad clinical application. These bottlenecks have prompted a paradigm shift toward in vivo CAR engineering, wherein nanocarriers directly deliver genetic material to circulating or tissue-resident immune cells, substantially simplifying the production process. This review first outlines the evolution of CAR immune cell therapy and key limitations of ex vivo approaches and then examines major delivery platforms for in vivo approaches. Comparative analyses are presented across delivery efficiency, cellular tropism, and expression kinetics, with particular emphasis on delineating the mechanistic distinctions and application boundaries between transient and durable expression strategies. We further dissect the critical challenges, including receptor-mediated non-specific immune activation, nanocarrier-associated immunogenicity constraining repeated administration, and delivery barriers imposed by the solid tumor microenvironment. Finally, the intrinsic trade-off between therapeutic durability and biosafety across distinct delivery platforms is discussed, along with the necessity that their clinical translation hinges on systematic optimization of delivery precision, immune compatibility, and expression controllability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.