ArticleInternational journal of human-computer interaction2025
Evaluating the Usability of Virtual Interview Training for Transition-Age Youth with Visual Impairments.
Article in International journal of human-computer interaction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interventions focused on job search skills and employment preparation for transition-age youth with visual impairments include content on interviewing but limited opportunities to practice via role-playing or mock interviews. Virtual interviewing simulations are cost-effective and can be implemented in various settings, allowing transition-age youth with visual impairments to practice job interview training. Our goal was to evaluate the usability of a virtual interview training simulation and identify ways to improve accessibility and user experiences for transition-age youth with visual impairments. Ten transition-age youth aged 17 to 25 participated in remote moderated usability sessions. Researchers evaluated usability with the System Usability Scale, open-ended questions about the participant's experience, task success rates, and task completion times. Our findings show that participants rated the virtual interview training's usability highly and were satisfied with the product overall. Findings also provide insight into conducting remote moderated usability studies with people with visual impairments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.