Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454360›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

Evaluating Student Engagement and Effectiveness of the Scenario-Case Discussion Learning Model in Medical Microbiology Education.

Jun Chen, Xinyang Li, Ting Zhang, Xinan Chen, Pengfei Jiang, Xiangyang Xue, Wenshu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jun ChenDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 325032, People's Republic of China.
Xinyang LiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, School of First Clinical Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 325032, People's Republic of China.
Ting ZhangDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 325032, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3845-7909
Xinan ChenDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 325032, People's Republic of China.
Pengfei JiangDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 325032, People's Republic of China.
Xiangyang XueDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 325032, People's Republic of China.
Wenshu LiDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 325032, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Case-based learning (CBL) in medical microbiology teaching serves as a crucial pedagogical link that bridges foundational knowledge and clinical thinking, but student participation, enthusiasm, and initiative are often lacking during the foundational learning stage. We designed a scenario-case discussion (SCD) model and evaluated its effectiveness in ensuring that under the student-centered principle, each student is motivated to actively participate and engages in self-directed learning and knowledge reconstruction. Methods: SCD activity was conducted over three academic years involving 240 second-year undergraduate medical students majoring in clinical medicine for a prospective quasi-experiment. Participants were divided into two classes: one receiving conventional CBL (120 students) and the other receiving SCD model (120 students). Knowledge comprehension and retention were assessed through content-based tests, while student engagement was evaluated based on classroom interactions and post-class feedback. Participant perceptions of the SCD were evaluated via questionnaires. Results: Despite slight variability in participants' age and gender, both the SCD and control classes showed significant improvement in pre- and post-test scores. Particularly noteworthy is the greater gain observed in the SCD group compared to the control class (mean increase: 1.99 vs. 1.03 points; Conclusion: The SCD teaching model significantly improved the educational outcomes of CBL sessions in medical microbiology. Given the current educational goal of fostering students as constructors and creators of knowledge, the SCD teaching practice may serve as a positive driver.

Indexed as

educational outcomesevaluationmedical microbiologyscenario-case discussion

Identifiers

PMID42454360
PMCPMC13367334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.