ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Evaluating Student Engagement and Effectiveness of the Scenario-Case Discussion Learning Model in Medical Microbiology Education.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the combined PBL-CBL teaching method based on Thorndike's Learning Theory in the education of bacterial resistance detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Case-based learning (CBL) in medical microbiology teaching serves as a crucial pedagogical link that bridges foundational knowledge and clinical thinking, but student participation, enthusiasm, and initiative are often lacking during the foundational learning stage. We designed a scenario-case discussion (SCD) model and evaluated its effectiveness in ensuring that under the student-centered principle, each student is motivated to actively participate and engages in self-directed learning and knowledge reconstruction. Methods: SCD activity was conducted over three academic years involving 240 second-year undergraduate medical students majoring in clinical medicine for a prospective quasi-experiment. Participants were divided into two classes: one receiving conventional CBL (120 students) and the other receiving SCD model (120 students). Knowledge comprehension and retention were assessed through content-based tests, while student engagement was evaluated based on classroom interactions and post-class feedback. Participant perceptions of the SCD were evaluated via questionnaires. Results: Despite slight variability in participants' age and gender, both the SCD and control classes showed significant improvement in pre- and post-test scores. Particularly noteworthy is the greater gain observed in the SCD group compared to the control class (mean increase: 1.99 vs. 1.03 points; Conclusion: The SCD teaching model significantly improved the educational outcomes of CBL sessions in medical microbiology. Given the current educational goal of fostering students as constructors and creators of knowledge, the SCD teaching practice may serve as a positive driver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.