ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Simulating the First Step: An Affordable ex vivo Tissue Model for Trocar Placement Training.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Trocar placement is a critical and potentially high-risk component of minimally invasive surgery. However, early hands-on training opportunities for surgical trainees are limited. Existing simulation models often lack realistic tactile fidelity or are constrained by cost and accessibility. We developed an affordable trocar placement training model using ex vivo animal tissue and assessed trainee perceptions of confidence, technical skills, and procedural risk awareness following its use. Patients and Methods: Our tissue-based abdominal wall simulation model was evaluated during surgical skills acquisition workshops for medical students. To simulate abdominal wall tension, fresh porcine and ovine abdominal wall tissues were tightly stretched over a 5-gallon plastic container using elastic straps. After standardized didactic instruction, the participants placed multiple trocars using the simulation models. Model fidelity and educational efficacy were assessed using an anonymous, voluntary, 5-point Likert-scale survey. Procedural confidence, perceived realism, and educational value were also evaluated. Results: According to the post-workshop survey analysis, 97% of the participants strongly agreed or agreed with the model's educational value, and 93% reported that the simulation model improved their self-perceived confidence in performing laparoscopic entry. High levels of perceived realism were reported for tissue resistance (92%), abdominal wall layer simulation (85%), and tactile feedback (82%). Sixty-four percent of the participants reported feeling more prepared to recognize trocar- and Veress needle-related complications. The participants expressed strong support for curriculum integration; most indicated the model enhanced their anatomical understanding and had educational value. Conclusion: Our ex vivo tissue-based trocar placement simulation model provided a realistic platform for elementary laparoscopic skill training. Following workshop participation, novice learners reported high confidence, perceived technical skill development, and awareness of procedural risks. Our model represents a simulation platform for hands-on surgical training that can help bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and operative psychomotor skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.