ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Cognitive-affective network structure in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: implications for clinical intervention.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) among adolescents represents a pressing global mental health challenge. Despite its high prevalence, the cognitive-affective mechanisms underlying NSSI remain poorly understood. Experiential avoidance (EA) and cognitive fusion (CF) represent key cognitive-affective processes implicated in NSSI vulnerability. This study examined the network architecture linking cognitive and affective components of EA and CF in adolescents with NSSI, to identify central and bridging elements that may inform clinical intervention strategies. Methods: A total of 4023 adolescents were recruited through a large-scale epidemiological survey. Network analysis was conducted within the subgroup of 1387 adolescents reporting NSSI in the past 12 months. NSSI behaviors were assessed using the Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Assessment Questionnaire. EA and CF were measured using the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II and the Chinese version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire, respectively. Network analysis was conducted to map the cognitive-affective network structure and identify central nodes (most interconnected components) and bridge nodes (linking cognitive and affective clusters). Results: Within the NSSI subgroup, the cognitive-affective network revealed that thought distress [Expected Influence (EI) = 1.13] emerged as the most central node, showing strong connections to inner struggle (weight = 0.25), conflicting thoughts (weight = 0.22), and painful thoughts (weight = 0.22). Bridge analysis identified painful thoughts [Bridge Expected Influence (BEI) = 0.44], emotional interference (BEI = 0.43), rumination and procrastination (BEI = 0.40), and task disruption (BEI = 0.39) as key bridging nodes linking cognitive and affective processes. The EI stability coefficient was 0.75, indicating good reliability. Network structure was invariant across sex. Conclusion: Thought distress occupies a central position in the cognitive-affective network of adolescent NSSI, while painful thoughts, emotional interference, rumination, and task disruption serve as key bridges between cognitive and affective domains, with bridging nodes spanning both EA and CF communities. These network-based findings highlight potential intervention targets that may help disrupt maladaptive cognitive-affective patterns in adolescents who engage in NSSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.