ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2026
Immune Cell Responses to Fluid Shear: Overview and Design Considerations for
Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluid flow is ubiquitous throughout the immune system. Immune cells exhibit sensitivity to fluid shear stress, altering their activation and behavior in response to the presence, magnitude, and timing of fluid flow. Therefore, understanding how flow regulates the immune response is crucial for understanding the immune system's contribution to homeostasis, disease progression, and therapeutic interventions. Recent developments have indicated Piezo1, a mechanosensitive ion channel protein, is a crucial mechanism for cell sensing and response to shear, but our understanding of how shear impacts immune function is far from complete. Open questions including: how cells respond to acute vs chronic shear stress exposure, how shear influences cell-cell communication, and direct molecular mechanisms require further investigation. In vitro modeling provides one promising approach to fill this gap, and many systems have been recently developed that incorporate flow to investigate the immune response in model organs and disease states. This review discusses recent advances in our understanding of fluid shear stress's impact on immune cell behavior, and we provide a landscape of in vitro models integrating flow and immune cells. To guide future development, we evaluate five critical design considerations: flow directionality, channel cross-section, culture substrate, recirculation strategies, and TEER compatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.