Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454277›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2026

Immune Cell Responses to Fluid Shear: Overview and Design Considerations for

Eric L Ginter, Laurel E Hind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric L GinterDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder - 3415 Colorado Ave, Boulder, CO 80303.
Laurel E HindDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder - 3415 Colorado Ave, Boulder, CO 80303.

Funding

Reconstructing Cell-Cell Interactions in Diverse Inflammatory EnvironmentsR35GM146737 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Laurel Erin Hind · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid flow is ubiquitous throughout the immune system. Immune cells exhibit sensitivity to fluid shear stress, altering their activation and behavior in response to the presence, magnitude, and timing of fluid flow. Therefore, understanding how flow regulates the immune response is crucial for understanding the immune system's contribution to homeostasis, disease progression, and therapeutic interventions. Recent developments have indicated Piezo1, a mechanosensitive ion channel protein, is a crucial mechanism for cell sensing and response to shear, but our understanding of how shear impacts immune function is far from complete. Open questions including: how cells respond to acute vs chronic shear stress exposure, how shear influences cell-cell communication, and direct molecular mechanisms require further investigation. In vitro modeling provides one promising approach to fill this gap, and many systems have been recently developed that incorporate flow to investigate the immune response in model organs and disease states. This review discusses recent advances in our understanding of fluid shear stress's impact on immune cell behavior, and we provide a landscape of in vitro models integrating flow and immune cells. To guide future development, we evaluate five critical design considerations: flow directionality, channel cross-section, culture substrate, recirculation strategies, and TEER compatibility.

Indexed as

FlowImmune responsein vitro modelsOrgan-on-chipPiezo1Shear stress

Identifiers

PMID42454277
PMCPMC13367919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.