ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2025
Caregiver perceptions and use of the Early Communication Indicator - Autism: Examining differences among demographic groups.
Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to the Forum: Intersectional Approaches to Language in Autism.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine caregiver perceptions and use of the Early Communication Indicator - Autism (ECI-A), an adapted, naturalistic assessment to measure progress on communication skills, and explore differences across racial and ethnic groups to provide preliminary data about the cultural responsiveness of the newly adapted ECI-A. Method: A total of 215 caregivers and their autistic child completed the ECI-A. The research team collected data on caregiver- and researcher reported ease of use of the ECI-A and caregiver ECI-A fidelity. Descriptive statistics are reported across racial and ethnic groups and group differences are examined between groups with sufficient sample size (Black and White caregivers, Latino and Non-Latino caregivers). Results: Overall, there was consistency in caregiver and researcher perceptions of ease of use and caregiver fidelity. The only statistically significant differences were for researcher-reported ease of use between Black and White caregivers and ECI-A fidelity for general procedures between Latino and non-Latino caregivers. Conclusions: The results suggest that the ECI-A is acceptable and feasible for use by caregivers from a range of racial and ethnic backgrounds. However, the two statistically significant differences suggest the need for careful attention to researcher biases for researcher-completed measures and more in-depth evaluation of the cultural responsiveness of the general ECI-A procedures, such as the number of play partners involved. It will be critical to continue work that informs and advances the use of culturally responsive assessment practices with autistic children and their families in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.