Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454216›Full record

ArticleResearch ethics2026

Rethinking ethical reflexivity and oversight in health research through an ecosystem approach: A workshop report.

Katharine Wright, Joseph Ali, Caesar Atuire, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Anna Chiumento, Agata Ferretti, Adrienne Hunt, Sharon Kaur, Rachel L Knowles, Carleigh B Krubiner and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Research ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Katharine WrightWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-4272-1591
Joseph AliJohns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Caesar AtuireUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Phaik Yeong CheahMahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anna ChiumentoUniversity of Edinburgh, UK.
Agata FerrettiETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Adrienne HuntWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sharon KaurUniversiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rachel L KnowlesMedical Research Council, UK Research and Innovation, Swindon, UK.
Carleigh B KrubinerWellcome Trust, London, UK.
Florencia LunaFLACSO, CABA, Argentina.
Paul NdebeleThe George Washington University, DC, USA.
Ana PalmeroWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
James ShawUniversity of Toronto, Canada.
Effy VayenaETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Teck Chuan VooSingHealth, Singapore, Singapore.
Jantina de VriesUniversity of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7192-2633
Katherine LittlerWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Training Program in Research Ethics in the AmericasR25TW001605 · FIC · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI LUNA, FLORENCIA · 2000 to 2025
$6.7M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW001605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the scope of morally relevant considerations widens and new challenges emerge at the frontiers of health innovation, there are questions about the appropriate role and remit for research ethics review, within the broader context of the whole health research ecosystem. Drawing on discussion at a satellite meeting at the 2022 Global Forum on Bioethics in Research in Cape Town, we argue that the ethical conduct of research is the responsibility of

Indexed as

ethical reflexivityethics ecosystemethics oversightethics reviewREC reviewresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID42454216
PMCPMC13367892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.