ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Endovascular embolization for treating hemothorax: caveats and considerations.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thoracic trauma is the third leading cause of death in all age groups. Around a quarter of trauma mortalities is related to thoracic trauma, with a portion of the patients developing a hemothorax requiring surgical intervention. Recently, endovascular embolization has seen a rise in usage as a less invasive alternative to surgical intervention in treating hemothorax. However, larger series and trials comparing efficacy and complication have yet to be completed. In this case series and narrative review of available literature, we described our experience with the endovascular treatment of hemothoraces, and performed a literature review of smaller series on efficacy and re-intervention rates of endovascular embolization compared to surgical intervention. Smaller described cohorts show efficacy rates of up to 93% of endovascular embolization in achieving hemostasis in traumatic hemothorax, with up to 68% needing surgical re-intervention. Based on our experiences and available literature, we propose a clinical algorithm when considering embolization instead of immediate surgical intervention. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-026-02202-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.