Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454162›Full record

ReviewJournal of inflammation research2026

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) as a Biomarker of Lower Airway Eosinophilic Inflammation: Benefits and Limitations.

Pasquale Ambrosino, Salvatore Fuschillo, Claudio Candia, Pasquale Di Leo, Mauro Maniscalco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pasquale Ambrosino *Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Scientific Directorate of Telese Terme Institute, Telese Terme, 82037, Italy.
Salvatore Fuschillo *Instituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit of Naples, Napoli, 80131, Italy.
Claudio CandiaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit of Telese Terme Institute, Telese Terme, 82037, Italy.
Pasquale Di LeoIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit of Telese Terme Institute, Telese Terme, 82037, Italy.
Mauro ManiscalcoIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit of Telese Terme Institute, Telese Terme, 82037, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6751-9921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has progressively consolidated its role in the assessment of type 2 (T2) airway inflammation, on the strength of standardized methodology, two decades of evidence in asthma and growing data in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis. The clinical interpretation of the measurement, however, remains uneven, partly because the underlying biology is often condensed into the shorthand of an eosinophilic biomarker. FeNO is generated by the airway epithelium through inducible nitric oxide synthase, whose transcription is driven primarily by interleukin-13 acting through STAT6, with interleukin-4 in a supporting role. The interleukin-5/eosinophil pathway runs in parallel and is not directly captured by FeNO. This single distinction explains the moderate correlation between FeNO and sputum eosinophils, the sensitivity of the measurement to inhaled corticosteroids, smoking, atopy and infection, and the differential magnitude of FeNO suppression observed under biologic therapies that target distinct points of the T2 cascade. Drawing on a non-systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed up to early 2026, with priority given to society guidelines, position papers and randomized trials with their biomarker analyses, the present narrative review reframes FeNO around its actual biological substrate and traces the implications for diagnosis, phenotyping, prediction of corticosteroid responsiveness, adherence assessment, exacerbation risk and biologic treatment selection across T2-high asthma, severe asthma referred for biologic therapy, eosinophilic COPD, eosinophilic bronchiectasis, chronic cough and the unified airway. Limitations are discussed alongside interpretation, since each constraint maps onto a specific bedside rule. Future directions converge on personalized reference intervals, multiple-flow analysis, breathomics and remote monitoring, and on a shift in the operational unit of decision-making from the isolated cut-off to the longitudinal trajectory interpreted within an integrated biomarker algorithm.

Indexed as

biologic therapydisabilityeosinophilic asthmafractional exhaled nitric oxideoutcomepulmonary rehabilitationtype 2 airway inflammation

Identifiers

PMID42454162
PMCPMC13367266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.