ArticleGMS health innovation and technologies2026
HLA-B27 detection test for individuals with suspected axial spondyloarthritis to Brazilian public health system: accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact analysis.
Article in GMS health innovation and technologies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: the aim of this study is to assess the accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of the HLA-B27 test in diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis to Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). Methods: A systematic review was conducted to assess the sensitivity and specificity of HLA-B27 compared to test ASAS or New York diagnostic criteria. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis (a decision tree model coupled with a Markov model and effectiveness outcome of quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) and budget impact analysis were also developed. Costs were obtained in Brazilian currency and converted to dollars considering the PPP conversion factor. Results: Twenty-nine studies have shown that the sensitivity of the HLA-B27 test was 68% (95% CI: 67-69%) and the specificity was 88% (95% CI: 87-88%) (very low certainty of evidence to both outcomes) when compared with any comparator. The analysis of two studies showed that the combination of HLA-B27+clinical parameters still achieved sensitivity and specificity comparable to or greater than the combination of imaging and clinical parameters, or clinical parameters alone. When compared with clinical evaluation and clinical evaluation±imaging, the HLA-B27 test+clinical evaluation was close to the cost-effectiveness threshold ($17,628 per QALY) and dominated the comparator, respectively. Furthermore, incorporating HLA-B27 into the SUS would result in an increase in costs of $530,393 in 5-years of analysis (mean of six thousands/year eligible patients to HLA-B27). Conclusion: The findings supported the coverage of the HLA-B27 test in SUS, considering that test increases accuracy when associated with other diagnostic strategies and has the potential to be cost-effective or dominant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.