ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2026
Relationship Between Floppy Eyelid Syndrome and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: An Umbrella Review.
Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship Between Floppy Eyelid Syndrome and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: An Umbrella Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is characterized by intermittent partial or complete interruption of airflow due to upper airway collapse during sleep. Increased eyelid elasticity and the presence of a lax tarsus are features that define floppy eyelid syndrome (FES). The prevalence of FES may reach up to 64.5% among patients with OSAS. Despite its strong association with cardiovascular events, OSAS remains largely underdiagnosed. The Methods: Systematic reviews were evaluated to investigate the association between OSAS and FES in adults. This umbrella review was registered in PROSPERO and followed the PICO framework to define the research question. From August 2023 to January 2025, multiple databases were searched using relevant terms. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using a GRADE framework adapted for umbrella reviews, and an overlap analysis was performed. Results: Seven systematic reviews were included. According to AMSTAR 2, most were classified as having low methodological confidence. The final GRADE certainty ranged from low to moderate. Overlap analysis indicated moderate overlap. Nevertheless, the included studies consistently reported an association between FES and OSAS. Conclusion: Consistent with previous literature, this review supports an association between FES and OSAS. Identification of FES or EL during clinical examination may increase suspicion of OSAS. Despite its clinical relevance, this association remains underrecognized, and further studies using standardized diagnostic criteria are needed to strengthen the available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.