Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454071›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2026

Risk of Inguinal Hernia Repair Following Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Rhiannon Lyons, Eric McArthur, Liane S Feldman, Ngan Lam, Kyla L Naylor, Chris Nguan, Doug Quan, Alp Sener, Jessica M Sontrop, Amit X Garg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rhiannon LyonsLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1741-5542
Eric McArthurLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6944-6471
Liane S FeldmanDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Ngan LamDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0129-7091
Kyla L NaylorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5304-8038
Chris NguanNephrology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Doug QuanUrology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Alp SenerUrology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Jessica M SontropDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7784-2028
Amit X GargLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3398-3114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A prior study of living kidney donors demonstrated a substantially higher long-term risk of hydrocelectomy among male living kidney donors who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy compared with nondonors. Given the potential shared anatomical pathways between hydrocele and indirect inguinal hernia formation, we aimed to evaluate the donation-attributable risk of inguinal hernia repair. Objective: To evaluate long-term rates of inguinal hernia repair in male living kidney donors compared to nondonors. Design and Setting: Population-based, retrospective matched cohort study using linked health administrative databases from Ontario, Canada. Patients: 848 male living kidney donors aged ≥18 years who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2023, were matched (1:10) to 8480 healthy male nondonors based on age, cohort entry date, rurality, neighbourhood income, and prior vasectomy. Individuals with prior scrotal conditions or previous inguinal hernia repair were excluded. Measurements: The primary outcome was inguinal hernia repair. Methods: Risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with robust variance. Cumulative incidence was estimated at key time points using Aalen-Johansen methods, treating death as a competing event. To contextualize the findings, incidence rates were also examined after other renal (e.g., nondonor nephrectomy, pyeloplasty) and abdominal surgeries. Results: Over a median follow-up of 8.8 years, 4.7% of donors (40 of 848) and 3.4% of nondonors (287 of 8480) underwent inguinal hernia repair. Donors had a modestly higher risk of undergoing inguinal hernia repair than nondonors (4.9 vs. 3.5 events per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio (HR) 1.40; 95% CI, 1.01-1.93; Limitations: This study relied on administrative data, which lacked information on hernia type (direct or indirect), laterality, pre-existing asymptomatic hernias, and key confounders such as body mass index and occupation. Donors may differ from nondonors in care-seeking behaviours and lifestyle factors, which could influence the observed risk. Conclusions: In contrast to the markedly higher risk of hydrocele repair, the donation-attributable risk of inguinal hernia repair in the years following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears modest, and in some comparisons was not evident. These findings support current counselling and selection practices for prospective donors, for which this outcome does not warrant specific consideration.

Indexed as

inguinal hernialaparoscopic nephrectomyliving kidney donation

Identifiers

PMID42454071
PMCPMC13365661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.