Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Nivolumab in previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma: real-world data from the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

Ondřej Fiala, Michaela Tkadlecová, Tomas Buchler, Jindřich Kopecký, Zuzana Tomčová, Michal Vočka, Zuzana Syčová-Milá, Hana Študentová, Martin Matějů, Alexander Savka and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Ondřej FialaDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Michaela TkadlecováDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Tomas BuchlerDepartment of Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Jindřich KopeckýDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czechia.
Zuzana Tomčová2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Michal VočkaDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Zuzana Syčová-Milá2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Hana ŠtudentováDepartment of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czechia.
Martin MatějůDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Alexander SavkaDepartment of Oncology, F. D. Roosevelt University General Hospital, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Eva ŠlachtováDepartment of Oncology, East Cancer Slovak Institute, Kosice, Slovakia.
Peter PriesterDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Jan KrálíčekDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Martina SpisarováDepartment of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czechia.
Anežka ZemánkováDepartment of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czechia.
Radka LohynskáDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Lucie GrmelováDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Jana Obertová2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Petr StránskýDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Bohuslav MelicharDepartment of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czechia.
Alexandr PoprachDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Patrik Palacka2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a cornerstone of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Nivolumab monotherapy remains an established option in previously treated patients; however, real-world data (RWD) from Central and Eastern Europe are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study using data from the RENIS II registry, including 501 patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the second or later line between 2013 and 2025 across the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and exploratory analyses of baseline inflammatory indices (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], and systemic immune-inflammation index [SII]). Results: Median OS was 24.2 months and median PFS was 8.6 months. The ORR was 28.8% and the DCR was 61.2% in the response-evaluable population. Grade 3/4 adverse events were recorded in 11.4% of patients. In exploratory analyses, higher baseline NLR, PLR, and SII were associated with inferior survival in univariable analyses. In multivariable models, NLR and PLR remained independently associated with OS and PFS, whereas SII did not retain independent prognostic significance. Conclusion: In this large multicenter real-world cohort, nivolumab monotherapy demonstrated consistent clinical activity and manageable toxicity in previously treated mRCC, with outcomes comparable to those reported in clinical trials and other European real-world studies. Baseline inflammatory indices, particularly NLR and PLR, showed potential prognostic value and warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Renal CellImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidney NeoplasmsNivolumabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCzech RepublicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSlovakiaTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabimmune checkpoint inhibitorsinflammation biomarkersmetastatic renal cell carcinomanivolumabreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID42454047
PMCPMC13364914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.