ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Nivolumab in previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma: real-world data from the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a cornerstone of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Nivolumab monotherapy remains an established option in previously treated patients; however, real-world data (RWD) from Central and Eastern Europe are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study using data from the RENIS II registry, including 501 patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the second or later line between 2013 and 2025 across the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and exploratory analyses of baseline inflammatory indices (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], and systemic immune-inflammation index [SII]). Results: Median OS was 24.2 months and median PFS was 8.6 months. The ORR was 28.8% and the DCR was 61.2% in the response-evaluable population. Grade 3/4 adverse events were recorded in 11.4% of patients. In exploratory analyses, higher baseline NLR, PLR, and SII were associated with inferior survival in univariable analyses. In multivariable models, NLR and PLR remained independently associated with OS and PFS, whereas SII did not retain independent prognostic significance. Conclusion: In this large multicenter real-world cohort, nivolumab monotherapy demonstrated consistent clinical activity and manageable toxicity in previously treated mRCC, with outcomes comparable to those reported in clinical trials and other European real-world studies. Baseline inflammatory indices, particularly NLR and PLR, showed potential prognostic value and warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.