Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454011›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Pulsed Radiofrequency in Postherpetic Neuralgia Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model.

Yajun Li, Baohong Shen, Nannan Zhai, Chong Chen, Changlin Dang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yajun Li *Department of Pain, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Medical University, Xinxiang, 453100, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0001-2053-9834
Baohong Shen *Department of Pain, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Medical University, Xinxiang, 453100, People's Republic of China.
Nannan ZhaiDepartment of Pain, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Medical University, Xinxiang, 453100, People's Republic of China.
Chong ChenDepartment of First Ward of Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Medical University, Xinxiang, 453100, People's Republic of China.
Changlin DangDepartment of First Ward of Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Medical University, Xinxiang, 453100, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a chronic neuropathic pain disorder with substantial heterogeneity in response to pulsed radiofrequency (PRF). This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model for predicting PRF efficacy in PHN patients. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 404 PHN patients treated with PRF between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set (n=283) and a validation set (n=121). Treatment efficacy was assessed 6 months after discharge. LASSO and the Boruta algorithms were used for feature selection. Six ML algorithms were developed and compared. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret the optimal model. Results: Of the 404 patients, 255 (63.12%) were classified as effective and 149 (36.88%) as ineffective. Six predictors were finally selected: age, duration of pain, diabetes mellitus (DM), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Among the candidate models, the random forest (RF) model showed the best overall predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.878 (95% CI: 0.806-0.949) in the validation set. SHAP analysis indicated that older age, longer pain duration, DM, and higher TNF-α and IL-6 were associated with poor response, whereas higher BDNF was associated with better outcome. Conclusion: An explainable ML model for predicting PRF efficacy in PHN patients was developed, and the RF model showed the best predictive performance. This model may assist individualized risk stratification and support clinical decision-making, but further prospective multicenter validation is required.

Indexed as

explainable machine learningpostherpetic neuralgiapulsed radiofrequencySHapley Additive exPlanationstreatment response

Identifiers

PMID42454011
PMCPMC13367366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.