ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Post Hoc Subgroup Analyses of the Efficacy and Safety of Zavegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine According to Baseline Triptan Experience.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II/III: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Trial of BHV-3500 for the Acute Treatment of Migraine
A Phase 2/3 Open-label, Long-Term, Safety Trial of BHV3500 (Zavegepant*) Intranasal (IN) for the Acute Treatment of Migraine
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Safety and Efficacy Trial of BHV-3500 (Zavegepant) Intranasal for the Acute Treatment of Migraine
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Zavegepant is a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor blocker (gepant). Gepants may be particularly useful in people who are triptan insufficient responders (TIR) and/or have contraindications for use of triptans. Methods: Post hoc analyses of efficacy and safety from the development program for zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray for the treatment of acute migraine in adults by baseline triptan experience. Pooled efficacy data from two double-blind, single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (NCT03872453, NCT04571060) were used to assess efficacy; co-primary efficacy endpoints were pain freedom (2 h PF) and most bothersome symptom (2 h MBS) freedom at 2 hours post-dose. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) from the 1-year, multiple-dose, open-label study (NCT04408794). Participants were grouped based on triptan use into a triptan naïve group (never used a triptan), TIR (used ≥1 triptans but not currently on a triptan), and current triptan users. Results: Overall, 2061 (pooled efficacy analysis set) and 603 (long-term safety analysis set) participants were included. In pooled analyses, 2 h PF rates for zavegepant versus placebo were 21.0% versus 11.9% ( Conclusion: In these post hoc analyses, response rates favored zavegepant versus placebo for the acute treatment of migraine, regardless of triptan experience. Zavegepant was well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.