Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

GaitSpoofNet: advanced spatio-temporal architectures for vision-based presentation attack detection.

Islam Mohamed, Ahmad Salah, Essam Debie, Marwa Abdellah, Amr Abdellatif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Islam Mohamed *Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ahmad Salah *Department of Computing and Information Sciences, College of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Ibri, Al Dhahirah, Oman.
Essam Debie *School of Information Technology and Systems, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Marwa AbdellahDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Amr AbdellatifDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gait recognition offers a promising non-intrusive biometric modality, but its widespread adoption is critically hindered by its vulnerability to spoofing attacks, also known as Presentation Attacks (PAs). Developing effective gait anti-spoofing, or Presentation Attack Detection (PAD), mechanisms is therefore paramount for the security and reliability of gait-based authentication systems. While anti-spoofing research in gait has been addressed across both sensor-based (accelerometer/gyroscope) and vision-based (silhouette/image) modalities, this work specifically focuses on vision-based, image-level gait PAD, a domain that critically lacks dedicated deep temporal models and standardized benchmarks. Gait spoofing is defined as deliberate manipulation of a subject's external appearance to deceive the authentication system. Methods: Unlike prior work, we evaluate models under two practical scenarios: a public-access environment (random splitting) and a restricted-access scenario (LNSOCV). We present a comprehensive comparative study of advanced spatio-temporal architectures for gait anti-spoofing. By repurposing the CASIA-B dataset, we establish a standardized vision-based PAD baseline. We systematically evaluate models incorporating the official Mamba Selective State Space Model (mamba-ssm), a custom Inspired Mamba architecture, Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, all leveraging a robust CNN backbone. Results: Our extensive experiments demonstrate that all investigated advanced temporal models significantly improve gait spoofing detection over baseline methods. In open-access environments, the GRU-based model proved to be the most effective for anti-spoofing, reaching a state-of-the-art final validation accuracy of 0.9840 and an ROC-AUC of 0.9983. Discussion: Under restricted-access conditions, the LSTM-based model demonstrated the strongest overall performance.

Indexed as

biometric securitycomparative studydeep learninggait anti-spoofinggait spoofing detectionGRULSTMMamba

Identifiers

PMID42453993
PMCPMC13365055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.