ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Compact waste image classification with multi-student CNNs and edge-oriented model selection.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automatic waste classification is an important enabling technology for cleaner cities, source-level recycling, and low-cost smart-bin systems. Although modern convolutional neural networks achieve strong recognition performance, their deployment on affordable edge devices remains constrained by memory footprint, computational cost, and response latency. This paper presents an edge-oriented compact CNN framework for waste image classification, combining a high-accuracy MobileNetV4 reference model with three lightweight student architectures: EfficientNet-Lite0, LCNet-0.5, and MobileNetV3-Small-0.5. All models are evaluated on TrashNet under a unified preprocessing, training, and size-accounting protocol, allowing a clear comparison of accuracy-efficiency trade-offs. On the main stratified train/validation/test split, the MobileNetV4 teacher achieves 97.09% top-1 accuracy, while the compact students retain strong performance with substantially smaller footprints: EfficientNet-Lite0 reaches 93.99% with 3.38 M parameters, LCNet-0.5 reaches 94.18% with only 0.61 M parameters, and MobileNetV3-Small-0.5 reaches 87.73% with 0.57 M parameters. A complementary stratified five-fold evaluation, including both knowledge-distilled and non-distilled student variants, provides a robust assessment of model behavior across data partitions and confirms LCNet-0.5 as the most suitable sub-megabyte candidate under the proposed size-accuracy selection rule. The selected LCNet-0.5 model achieves a macro-F1 score of 0.9247 on the main TrashNet test split and is integrated into a self-contained Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ prototype that performs local camera-to-display inference with an observed end-to-end latency of approximately 1.0 s per image. Cross-dataset evaluation on RealWaste further shows that the compact model can be adapted effectively to cluttered real-world imagery through short fine-tuning. Overall, the results demonstrate that careful lightweight architecture selection, supported by knowledge distillation analysis and edge-prototype validation, can deliver accurate, compact, and practically deployable waste classifiers for resource-constrained environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.