Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453976›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Comparative clinical and thermographic responses to dexamethasone and saline solution mesotherapy in horses with spinal disorders.

Tainã Kuwer Jacobsen, Marcos da Silva Azevedo, Sandro Colla, Anderson Ramos Carvalho, Flavio Desessards De La Corte, Grasiela De Bastiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tainã Kuwer JacobsenGraduate Program in Animal Medicine: Equines, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Marcos da Silva AzevedoDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University Veterinary Hospital, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Sandro CollaDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Equine Performance and Rehabilitation Center, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Anderson Ramos CarvalhoLaboratory of Chemometrics and Analytical Instrumentation, Institute of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Flavio Desessards De La CorteDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University Veterinary Hospital, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Grasiela De BastianiGraduate Program in Animal Medicine: Equines, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Back pain and spinal dysfunction in horses are multifactorial conditions frequently associated with musculoskeletal alterations that may impair mobility, performance, and welfare. Mesotherapy has emerged as a minimally invasive adjunctive approach for managing musculoskeletal disorders; however, comparative clinical responses to different intradermal protocols in equine spinal conditions remain insufficiently investigated. The present study aims to compare the clinical and thermographic responses of two mesotherapy protocols in horses diagnosed with cervical or thoracolumbar spinal disorders. Methods: Forty horses with ultrasonographically confirmed spinal alterations were stratified by anatomical region (cervical or thoracolumbar) and randomly allocated into four subgroups ( Results: Temporal improvements were observed in joint mobility and thermographic with a progressive improvement in thoracolumbar extension mobility observed from 48 h ( Conclusion: Under the present experimental conditions, both mesotherapy protocols were associated with comparable clinical and thermographic responses over time. However, given the absence of untreated or sham-treated control groups, these findings should be interpreted as comparative responses between active protocols rather than definitive evidence of therapeutic efficacy or mechanistic action. Further controlled studies are warranted to clarify therapeutic effects and procedural contributions.

Indexed as

axial dysfunctioncervical spinedexamethasonehorsesmesotherapyspinal disordersthermographythoracolumbar spine

Identifiers

PMID42453976
PMCPMC13364598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.