Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453896›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Low-cost social robot designs for education: a review.

Edger P Rutatola, Frank C Msonge, Remko Proesmans, Koen Stroeken, Tony Belpaeme

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edger P RutatolaIDLab-AIRO, Ghent University-imec, Ghent, Belgium.
Frank C MsongeDepartment of Computing Science Studies, Faculty of Science and Technology, Mzumbe University, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Remko ProesmansIDLab-AIRO, Ghent University-imec, Ghent, Belgium.
Koen StroekenCentre for Anthropological Research on Affect and Materiality (CARAM), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Tony BelpaemeIDLab-AIRO, Ghent University-imec, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social robots have shown promising potential in educational contexts worldwide, with studies reporting significant cognitive and affective gains when such robots are deployed. However, among other factors, the high cost of commercial robots limits this line of research to a small number of laboratories and hinders large-scale adoption in real-world educational settings, with most studies remaining short-term pilot interventions. Although several reviews exist in this domain, they primarily focus on applications, impacts, and trends, with limited attention to robot design in relation to affordability. Using a systematic literature review, this study identifies the features and capabilities commonly incorporated in low-cost social robots in educational contexts, as well as the design choices that balance effectiveness and affordability. Thirty-four (34) studies describing low-cost custom social robot designs were analysed following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and the ACM Digital Library, and analysed using content analysis as well as descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings show that speech-based interaction (73.5%), vision capabilities (53%), and body-part movement (47%) are the most frequently reported features supporting learner-robot interaction. Additional features include expressive displays, touch input, and mobility. While 3D-printed housings are the most commonly adopted solution, alternative low-cost materials such as plywood and plush toys are also used. The use of smartphones as integrated computational and interaction platforms emerged as an innovative approach. Furthermore, commonly used sensors, actuators, and compute platforms are identified. This review provides a design-oriented perspective on developing effective yet affordable social robots and highlights practical design trade-offs for researchers, particularly in low-resource contexts.

Indexed as

custom robotseducational robotshuman-robot interactionlow-cost robotsrobot designsensors and actuatorssocial robotssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42453896
PMCPMC13364618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.