ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Multimodal habitat radiomics based on automated breast volume scanning and conventional ultrasound for risk stratification of biopsy-confirmed BI-RADS 4A breast lesions.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop and validate a multimodal habitat radiomics model integrating automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) for risk stratification of biopsy-selected BI-RADS 4A breast lesions. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 160 consecutive patients with BI-RADS 4A breast lesions confirmed by histopathology between January 2024 and May 2025. Tumoral and peritumoral regions were manually segmented on ABVS and 2D-US images. Habitat subregions were generated using a local spatial autocorrelation-based heterogeneity analysis. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Feature selection was performed using t-test filtering, Pearson correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression within the training folds. Multiple machine learning classifiers were constructed using three-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Of the 160 lesions, 51 (31.9%) were malignant and 109 (68.1%) were benign. The habitat radiomics model outperformed the clinical-ultrasound model. The optimal multilayer perceptron classifier achieved an AUC of 0.910 and an accuracy of 0.869 in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis demonstrated higher net benefit across a range of threshold probabilities, and calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Conclusion: Multimodal habitat radiomics integrating ABVS and conventional ultrasound demonstrated promising performance for risk stratification of biopsy-selected BI-RADS 4A lesions and may provide supportive information for individualized clinical decision-making. Further prospective multicenter validation is warranted before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.