ReviewCureus2026
Thromboprophylaxis in Intermediate and Major Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Narrative Review and Proposal of the TROMBO-PLAST Integrated Decision-Making Model.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable perioperative morbidity and mortality in plastic surgery. However, its prevention demonstrates considerable variation in clinical practice, ranging from under-prophylaxis driven by concerns about hematoma formation to routine over-prophylaxis based solely on numerical risk scores. This narrative review critically examines the available tools for thrombotic and bleeding risk stratification in intermediate and major plastic surgery procedures and proposes an integrated decision-making model tailored to the specialty. A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and SciELO, with priority given to publications from 2020 to 2026, complemented by selected landmark references. The Caprini score remains the most extensively validated risk stratification tool; however, it is insufficient when used in isolation. Integration with bleeding risk assessment, recognition of specialty-specific risk factors (including large-volume liposuction, abdominoplasty, gluteal fat grafting, post-bariatric body contouring, microsurgical flaps, and combined procedures), universal mechanical prophylaxis measures, appropriate timing of low-molecular-weight heparin administration, and dynamic postoperative reassessment can facilitate safer clinical decision-making. Thromboprophylaxis in plastic surgery requires the integration of thrombotic risk, bleeding risk, procedural context, and postoperative reassessment. The TROMBO-PLAST model is proposed as a practical framework to support this clinical reasoning while preserving individualized clinical judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.