ArticleEndocrines2026
Variability in the management of healthy short youth following GH stimulation testing.
Article in Endocrines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Recent Delphi survey of endocrinologists revealed low consensus regarding the diagnosis of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Thus, we sought to describe the various trajectories undertaken by healthy 8-14 year old youth in the 2 years following testing for GHD at a single major pediatric academic institution. Methods: Electronic health records were reviewed for the current analysis from healthy 8-14 year old participants enrolled in a prospective longitudinal observational study of parent and youth characteristics associated with youth quality of life and self-esteem over a two-year period following growth hormone (GH) stimulation testing. Participants were grouped according to their peak GH concentration on testing (<7, 7-10, and ≥10 ng/ml), and outcomes included treatment (or not) with GH or other growth-altering hormonal treatments. Results: Of the 115 participants, 27 (23%) had peak GH <7 ng/ml, 27 (23%) 7-10 ng/ml, and 61 (53%) peaked ≥10 ng/ml. Across the 3 groups, some patients were not offered GH treatment, some were offered yet did not pursue treatment, and some were offered and treated - with further variance provided by GH treatment interruptions, early cessation Conclusions: Even within the network of a single academic institution, variability is evident in the management of healthy 8-14 year old short youth following GH stimulation testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.