Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453778›Full record

ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2026

Real-world Impact of HPV Vaccination on CIN2+ Reduction: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies Assessing Variation by Age, Coverage, and Vaccine Type.

Addisu J Zeleke, Laura Reifferscheid, Umar Yunusa, Megan Kennedy, Manish Sadarangani, Gina Ogilvie, Shannon E MacDonald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Addisu J ZelekeFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5197-1355
Laura ReifferscheidFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-9606
Umar YunusaFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3079-7730
Megan KennedyGeoffrey and Robyn Sperber Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Manish SadaranganiVaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Bc, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9985-6452
Gina OgilvieSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Bc, Canada.
Shannon E MacDonaldFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-4433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination reduces the incidence of high-grade cervical lesions, but its population-level impact on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) may vary by age at vaccination, program coverage, and vaccine type. The extent to which these factors explain variation in CIN2+ outcomes across real-world vaccination programs remains incompletely quantified. Methods: Using data from a prior systematic review of observational studies across HPV-related endpoints, we restricted this meta-analysis to studies reporting histologically confirmed CIN2+. Reported ratio measures were analyzed on the natural log scale using random-effects models fitted by restricted maximum likelihood with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman inference. Prespecified subgroup analyses examined age at vaccination, vaccination coverage, and vaccine type. Exploratory univariable meta-regressions assessed follow-up duration, age-at-vaccination category, study design, and publication year. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the influence of effect-measure type, alternative between-study variance estimation, and trim-and-fill adjustment. A frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) compared vaccine types versus no vaccination. Results: Twenty-two studies were included. HPV vaccination was associated with a pooled ratio estimate of 0.38 (95% CI 0.29-0.50), corresponding to an approximate 62% reduction in CIN2+ occurrence. Heterogeneity was very high (I Conclusions: HPV vaccination was associated with a substantial average reduction in CIN2+ occurrence across observational studies. However, high heterogeneity, wide prediction intervals, nonsignificant subgroup tests, and indirect network comparisons indicate that subgroup and vaccine-type findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Indexed as

CIN2+HPV vaccinationhuman papillomavirusnetwork meta-analysisvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID42453778
PMCPMC13367439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.