ArticleAIMS neuroscience2026
An energy-gradient theory of embedded predictions in the brain.
Article in AIMS neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Activity gradients measured with neuroimaging play a fundamental role in brain function, yet their relationship to the brain's internal predictive models during rest remains poorly understood. Clarifying this relationship can reveal how the brain processes information efficiently and adapts to a changing environment. Here, I discussed how energy flows may give rise to gradients of activity between voxels and to spatial coding in fMRI, and I described computational algorithms that can be applied directly to brain-activity images. I proposed that the brain continuously maintains and updates predictions about its environment through internal models, and that these models are embedded in the dynamic activity flows observed at rest and during cognitive tasks. This perspective emphasizes the role of energy turnover in supporting cognition: Neural circuits reflect predictions and adjustments shaped by past experience. I argue that the interplay between predictive processing and energy dynamics offers a richer account of cognitive mechanisms and points to new research directions in psychology and physiology. Together, these insights underscore the importance of energetic principles in brain physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.