ArticleAIMS neuroscience2026
Enhancing EEG based cognitive state classification using graph Fourier transform.
Article in AIMS neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) based cognitive state classification has been widely explored with deep-learning models demonstrating remarkable performance. Deep-learning models need high computational resources and large datasets, creating a need for an alternative methodology. Graph signal processing (GSP) techniques provide an effective lightweight alternative by capturing spatial dependencies across the channels. This study investigates the effectiveness of GSP-based graph Fourier transform (GFT) features on a publicly available EEG mental arithmetic task (EEGMAT) dataset. A strict 5-fold cross-validation has been used as an evaluation technique. GFT is applied to extract spatial-spectral features by modeling EEG-channels as graph nodes. The extracted features have been evaluated using multiple classifiers including Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Decision Tree (DT), and Logistic Regression (LR). Statistical analysis confirms the significance of GFT features compared to raw signals. RF gave the highest accuracy of approximately 99 percent. Model interpretability based on Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) revealed that the frontal and central regions contributed to the classification aligning with the findings of cognitive neuroscientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.