ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Transfer learning and vision transformer for the automatic diagnosis of cataracts in ophthalmological images.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cataracts continue to be the leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide and represent a significant public health challenge, particularly in rural and underserved regions where access to ophthalmology specialists and diagnostic infrastructure is limited. Early detection plays a crucial role in preventing visual impairment and improving treatment outcomes; however, large-scale screening programs are often constrained by the availability of trained professionals and specialized equipment. The purpose of this research was to develop and evaluate an automated cataract detection system based on deep learning using retinal fundus images in order to support early screening and improve accessibility to ophthalmological diagnosis. Methods: The proposed methodology followed an experimental quantitative approach that included dataset preparation, image preprocessing, model training, and performance evaluation. A labeled subset of 2,658 retinal fundus images extracted from the ODIR-5K dataset was used as the primary data source. The images underwent preprocessing procedures including normalization and noise reduction, followed by data augmentation techniques such as random rotations (±10°), scaling (90%-110%), and brightness and contrast adjustments. These transformations allowed the creation of a balanced dataset of 4,840 images, enhancing model generalization and reducing overfitting. Six deep neural network architectures were trained and evaluated: ResNet152, EfficientNet-v2S, Inception v3, MobileNet v3, DenseNet201, and Vision Transformer (ViT). Transfer learning with ImageNet pre-trained weights was applied together with selective fine-tuning of deeper layers and optimization using the Adam algorithm combined with a Cosine Annealing learning rate scheduler. Results: The results obtained indicate that ResNet152 is the bestperforming architecture with an accuracy of 99.10%, precision of 99.72%, sensitivity of 98.46%, and F1 score of 99.08%. It is concluded that deep convolutional neural network architectures, particularly ResNet152, provide highly effective performance for automated cataract detection from retinal fundus images. Discusion: The proposed system demonstrates strong potential as a clinical decision-support tool for large-scale screening programs, especially in resource-limited settings, as it can facilitate early diagnosis, improve access to ophthalmological care, and reduce the diagnostic workload of specialized medical personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.