SynthesisFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Virtual reality-based interventions targeting sports injury-related risk factors: a systematic review of biomechanical, neuromuscular, and functional outcomes.
Synthesis in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual reality (VR)-based interventions are increasingly applied in sports training and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. However, their potential role in modifying lower-extremity injury-related risk factors in athletic populations remains incompletely understood. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SportDiscus were searched up to September 25th, 2025. Eligible studies included randomized, controlled, quasi-experimental, or within-subject experimental designs evaluating immersive, semi-immersive, or non-immersive VR interventions in junior to young-adult athletes. Comparator conditions included conventional training, alternative exercise interventions, no-intervention controls, placebo conditions, or non-VR comparisons. Outcomes addressed biomechanical, neuromuscular, functional, perceptual-cognitive, or psychological factors potentially relevant to sports injury risk. Methodological quality was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Results: Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions ranged from single-session biofeedback exposure to 4-16-week neuromuscular, balance, perceptual-cognitive, or sensorimotor programs across multiple sports. Most studies reported improvements in at least one biomechanical, neuromuscular, functional, perceptual-cognitive, or psychological outcome; particularly, in lower-extremity movement control, balance, coordination, and reaction efficiency. However, several acute studies demonstrated transiently less favorable movement mechanics during highly immersive or cognitively demanding tasks. Importantly, no included study evaluated injury incidence as a primary preventive outcome. Downs and Black scores ranged from 14 to 26 (mean = 19.6 ± 3.1), indicating overall fair-to-good methodological quality. Discussion: The evidence suggests that VR-based training can effectively modify several surrogate lower-extremity injury-related risk factors; particularly, those associated with biomechanics and neuromuscular control. Nevertheless, the lack of longitudinal data and the scarcity of injury-incidence outcomes limit conclusions regarding real-world preventive efficacy. Conclusions: VR-based interventions may represent a promising adjunct to conventional neuromuscular and perceptual-cognitive training approaches for modifying surrogate lower-extremity injury-related factors. Nevertheless, substantial heterogeneity, limited longitudinal follow-up, and the absence of injury-incidence outcomes restrict conclusions regarding definitive preventive efficacy. Future adequately powered randomized trials with standardized protocols and verified injury outcomes are required. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251163302, identifier CRD420251163302.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.