Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453606›Full record

ReviewOpen life sciences2026

Microbiological diagnosis of the scalp and hair in 20-40 year olds - preliminary studies.

Katarzyna Duda-Grychtoł, Karolina Oleś, Marta Palacz-Wróbel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarzyna Duda-GrychtołSilesian College of Medicine in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7306-9611
Karolina OleśSilesian College of Medicine in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Marta Palacz-WróbelSilesian College of Medicine in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiome refers to the collection of microorganisms living in the human body. Skin, intestines and upper respiratory tract are particularly inhabited by microorganisms. The microbiota of the scalp and hair, though so far little understood, is particularly abundant in terms of microorganisms, which play an important role in maintaining the health of the scalp by inhibiting pathogens and promoting optimal skin condition. Dysbiosis of the scalp microbiota can be influenced by many factors, both exo and endogenous leading to the development of pathological conditions such as dandruff or seborrhoeic dermatitis. The aim of this preliminary study was the microbiological diagnosis of the scalp and hair in the group of individuals aged 20-40 years old. The samples for the research have been obtained from three different sites on the scalp of 6 individuals aged 20 to 40. The material for the study was collected using contact plates for total bacterial counts - Rodac Contact Test. The colonies grown on the microbiological media were characterised in terms of their size and shape. Subsequently, Gram staining was performed to assign the colonies of the bacteria to Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungi characterisation of the scalp and hair was conducted using a trichological camera. Finally, on the basis of the study following conclusions have been drawn. There were observed differences in the appearance of microbial colonies between younger and older people and in the group of 40-year-old, there was a significantly less colony diversity monitored. In terms of bacteria, Gram-positive cocci got isolated most frequently. In addition, yeast as well as filamentous fungi occurred abundant in the middle of the head of the research participants.

Indexed as

dysbiosisscalp microbiometrichological camera

Identifiers

PMID42453606
PMCPMC13367295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.