ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Comprehensive whole genome sequencing-based pharmacogenomics profiling using a personalized genome interpretation workflow.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Personalized Medicine and precision therapeutics hold promise to revolutionize modern clinical practice, by improving clinical decision making and maximizing drug efficacy, while minimizing drug toxicity, based on the unique patient's genetic profile. Clinical decision support tools aim to help clinicians to implement genome-guided therapeutics and genomic medicine with the translation of a patient's genomic information into a clinically meaningful format. Here, we developed a personalized genome interpretation workflow, based on open-source code for facilitating the practice of precision therapeutics. Methods: Using two different previously validated pharmacogene panels, namely, the 12-pharmacogene PREPARE study panel and the 87-pharmacogene PyPGx panel, we comprehensively analyzed and reported clinically actionable, rare and novel variants, the majority of which lie at the introns and the fringe of the pharmacogenes in question. Results and Discussion: Τwo types of pharmacogenomics (PGx) reports were also produced for three members of a Greek family from data derived from whole genome sequencing. Our results demonstrate that this genome interpretation workflow enables targeted comprehensive clinical PGx assessment, with rare and novel PGx variants included in both reports for hypothesis generation. Although this overlap would not serve as validation, our workflow holds promise to facilitate implementation of PGx in the clinic using next-generation sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.