ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Pharmacovigilance analysis of central nervous system adverse events associated with sevoflurane and drug interactions: a disproportionality study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sevoflurane is rarely administered as monotherapy in clinical anesthesia practice, yet the safety profile of its drug-drug interactions (DDIs) remains incompletely characterized in real-world settings. To systematically identify and quantify disproportionality signals for central nervous system (CNS) adverse events associated with sevoflurane combinations using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Reports from 2004 Q1 to 2025 Q2 listing sevoflurane as primary suspect were extracted and deduplicated. Disproportionality analysis employed Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) to detect signals, supplemented by Bayesian methods (EBGM and IC) for multi-method validation. A hierarchical approach progressed from broad CNS adverse event screening to drug class-level and individual drug-level analyses. Interaction Reporting Odds Ratio (IOR) models quantified synergistic interaction signals under both PS-restricted and role-independent frameworks, with the Ω shrinkage measure applied as a Bayesian validation method for all IOR signals. Results: Among 4,129 sevoflurane reports (2,903 concomitant use, 1,226 quasi-monotherapy), multiple significant signals emerged. Intravenous anesthetics and opioid analgesics demonstrated the highest signal rates (44.4% each). Movement disorders, particularly dystonia, exhibited the strongest signals across multiple drug classes. Morphine combination with sevoflurane showed a notably high dystonia signal (ROR: 66.64). IOR analysis identified supra-additive interactions: morphine-dystonia (IOR: 9.46), fentanyl-dystonia (IOR: 2.96), and propofol-confusional state (IOR: 2.56). Ω shrinkage validation confirmed fentanyl-dystonia and propofol-confusional state as true synergistic signals. The role-independent analysis identified seven additional supra-additive IOR signals, with morphine-dystonia retaining significance across both frameworks. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the core signals. Conclusion: Sevoflurane DDIs might be associated with multiple CNS adverse event signals, particularly movement and consciousness disorders. Dual-method validation using IOR and Ω shrinkage measure enhanced signal discrimination and reduced false-positive risk. These findings warrant clinical vigilance in vulnerable populations and prospective validation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.