ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Herbal decoction and lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a real-world study using linked electronic health records and claims data.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a major cause of low back pain and may require surgical intervention when conservative or non-surgical treatment fails. In Korea, herbal medicine is commonly used as part of non-surgical care; however, its long-term effect on the risk of lumbar surgery has been difficult to assess because herbal decoctions have historically not been recorded in national insurance claims data. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study by linking electronic health records (EHRs) from four Korean medical hospitals with National Health Insurance claims data. Patients newly diagnosed with LDH (ICD-10 M51) between 2016 and 2017 were included. The index date was defined as 1 year after the first hospital visit, and patients were followed until 31 July 2021. Exposure was defined as receiving herbal decoction for ≥30 days versus <30 days during the 1-year period between the entry date and index date. Patients with red-flag conditions or those who underwent lumbar surgery before the index date were excluded from the study. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using age, sex, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and baseline leg pain numeric rating scale. Lumbar surgery was identified using procedure codes for discectomy, laminectomy, or spinal fusion. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between herbal decoction use and surgery. Results: Among 6,669 eligible patients, 2,504 received herbal decoction for ≥30 days. After propensity score matching, 2,473 patients remained in each group, with good balance across baseline covariates (standardized mean differences <0.1). The ≥30-day group showed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of lumbar surgery compared with the <30-day group (2.63% vs. 3.64%; log-rank p = 0.033). Across sequential Cox regression models, longer herbal decoction use was consistently associated with a reduced risk of lumbar surgery, hazard ratio (HR) 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.97). Discussion: In this real-world study linking EHR and claims data, herbal decoction use for ≥30 days was associated with a lower risk of subsequent lumbar spine surgery in patients with LDH. These findings suggest that herbal medicine may be an effective non-surgical treatment option and warrant confirmation in prospective and randomized studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.