ReviewTzu chi medical journal
Strengthening the shield: Cognitive behavioral therapy as a critical adjunct in ovarian cancer chemotherapy - Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of treatment but is commonly associated with psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, and reduced quality of life (QoL). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in women with ovarian cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The study was registered in PROSPERO and conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials published between 2018 and 2025 were identified through PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Risk of bias (RoB-2) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Outcomes included depression and anxiety measured by the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Patient Health Questionnaire-8, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), fatigue, fear of cancer recurrence assessed by Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form, and QoL evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.4. CBT significantly reduced depressive symptoms measured by SDS (mean difference [MD] = -5.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.45 to -3.76;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.