ArticleNeurology open access2025
Facial Expression Metrics as Digital Biomarkers of Neurologic Disease.
Article in Neurology open access, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Facial movements can be key indicators of neurological health and emotional state, offering insights into motor and neuropsychiatric functions that are disrupted in neurologic disorders. Neurological disease can present with characteristic differences in facial movements, like the masked facies of parkinsonism. Automated digital facial expression recognition could assist in asynchronous, remote and objective diagnostic processes. We hypothesized that facial movements relating to smiling, frowning, and blinking could be extracted from brief video-taped encounters in a clinic setting and used to (1) differentiate between neurologic diagnoses, and (2) identify people with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Methods: Using untargeted recruitment, individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), other conditions (parkinsonism, frontotemporal dementia (FTD)), and healthy controls (HC) enrolled in an ongoing digital phenotyping study. Participant faces were video-recorded during a spontaneous language task. Videos were processed using OpenFace 2.2.0, an open-access digital tool pre-trained for facial landmark detection and facial action unit recognition. Participants with MS completed the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Results: Videos were analyzed for adults with MS (n=151, mean age 48, 72% female), parkinsonism (n=23, mean age 67, 35% female), FTD (n=14, mean age 68, 29% female), and HCs (n=33, mean age 55, 58% female). Sampling duration was 60-90 seconds; 91% videos passed quality control. Individuals with parkinsonism had decreased eye-blinking compared to all groups, and decreased smiling and increased brow-lowering compared to MS and HCs. Individuals with FTD had increased blinking relative to other groups. There were no significant differences between individuals with MS and HCs. Classification accuracy for partition analysis model was 88% (ROC-AUC 0.84 for parkinsonism). In individuals with MS, decreased variability in brow lowerering was seen with higher anxiety symptoms, and decreased cheek raising intensity was seen with higher depression symptoms. Interpretation: Digitally identified facial movements have face validity for recapitulating known clinical characteristics of neurological disease, as well as reflecting internal state relating to mood. This provides a foundation for expanded longitudinal validation of computer vision-based facial movement analysis in neurological research. However, findings should be interpreted in the context of sample size imbalance across diagnostic groups, which may have influenced classification performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.