ArticleLearning health systems2026
Developing a Program Evaluation Training Within a National Federal Healthcare Setting: Veterans Affairs Evaluation Bootcamp Training.
Article in Learning health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Learning Health Systems (LHSs) depend on the ability to effectively evaluate programs and translate data into practice. Within the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system, formal mandates require programmatic decision-making to be data-driven; however, opportunities for staff to develop applied program evaluation skills that support LHS learning cycles remain limited. Methods: To address this need, the synchronous virtual Evaluation Bootcamp Training (EBcT) was developed to equip learners with practical, applied evaluation skills. This manuscript describes the design rationale, structure, and core concepts of the training, emphasizing design decisions intended to support evaluation capacity building within a large and complex health system. Results: EBcT was delivered over 4 days across 2 training cohorts (8 learners in 4 project teams from Cohort 1; 12 learners in 5 project teams from Cohort 2). Project teams addressed a range of clinical and operational initiatives within VA. Learners represented diverse professional roles, including lead evaluators, clinical subject matter experts, project managers, operational leaders, and analysts. Learners reported high satisfaction throughout the training, with full attendance at application sessions and strong participation in didactic components. A majority reported meeting predefined evaluation learning targets at the end of the training. Conclusion: Findings suggest that structured, team-based training models such as EBcT can strengthen evaluation capacity and support LHS functioning by equipping project teams to engage in repeated cycles of measurement, learning, and performance improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.