Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453463›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Traditional ecological knowledge and mental health education for sustainable community well-being.

Shuai Xu, Ke Xu, Waqar Ahmad, Valentin-Marian Antohi, Costinela Fortea, Mihaela Neculita

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuai XuSchool of Marxism, Sias University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ke XuSchool of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Waqar AhmadSchool of Economics, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Valentin-Marian AntohiDepartment of Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University of Galați, Galați, Romania.
Costinela ForteaDepartment of Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University of Galați, Galați, Romania.
Mihaela NeculitaDepartment of Economics, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galați, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) refers to the traditional and cumulative knowledge, skills, and beliefs about the relationship between humans and nature that are passed on from generation to generation within indigenous cultures. As communities worldwide grapple with mental health issues, environmental deterioration, social disintegration, and the loss of indigenous knowledge systems, there is a growing interest in approaches that integrate TEK to promote holistic well-being. The current mixed-methods study was carried out in Southwestern China among ethnic communities to investigate the role of TEK in mental health education and sustainable community well-being. Data were collected through a validated 32-item questionnaire (internal consistency reliability: Cronbach's

Indexed as

community well-beingindigenous knowledgemental health educationsustainable developmenttraditional ecological knowledge

Identifiers

PMID42453463
PMCPMC13364546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.