ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Cultural and relational factors in interpersonal distance regulation: evidence from a 2D screen-based task in Spain, Italy, and Japan.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpersonal distance regulation varies across cultural contexts and individual relational orientations, yet its determinants in digitally mediated social environments remain insufficiently understood. This cross-sectional, cross-cultural study examined associations between early child-rearing practices (co-sleeping and co-bathing), adult attachment-related dimensions (anxiety and avoidance), perceptual sensitivity to visual context, and tolerance for interpersonal proximity in a controlled 2D screen-based task. A total of 305 adults from Spain, Italy, and Japan completed self-report measures, including the Experiences in Close Relationships scale, as well as three computerized tasks: the Ebbinghaus illusion, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and a personal-space judgment task involving various humanoid figures. Japanese participants reported higher prevalence and longer duration of co-sleeping and co-bathing, higher attachment-related avoidance, and greater tolerance for interpersonal closeness in the 2D task, whereas Spanish and Italian participants preferred larger interpersonal distances. Cross-cultural differences also emerged in susceptibility to visual illusions. Bivariate associations suggested links between early caregiving practices, attachment-related avoidance, perceptual sensitivity, and personal space preferences; however, these associations were substantially attenuated after adjusting for cultural context and demographic variables. Overall, the findings indicate that interpersonal distance regulation in screen-based contexts is more strongly associated with cultural norms than with early caregiving practices or adult attachment orientations, while perceptual processes intersect with social regulation in culturally patterned ways, suggesting that norms of interpersonal closeness may not translate directly from face-to-face interactions to screen-based settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.