ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
From exile to medal: psychosocial wellbeing, belonging, and global solidarity in the Refugee Olympic Team through an ACTM perspective.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study examines the Refugee Olympic Team (ROT) within the broader context of the modern Olympic Games and the global refugee crisis. While the initiative is frequently framed as a symbol of hope and global solidarity, its broader psychosocial and institutional implications remain underexplored. Methods: Using an interpretivist qualitative research design, the study conducted qualitative document analysis and thematic analysis of 26 institutional documents, United Nations reports, and international media sources published between 2009 and 2025. The analysis was guided by the Athletic Career Transition Model (ACTM). Results: The findings show that the ROT provides meaningful symbolic recognition and transition resources by fostering visibility, belonging, hope, and resilience among displaced athletes. However, the analysis also reveals that institutional and media representations frequently construct refugee athletes as exceptional "model migrants," thereby reinforcing selective inclusion, conditional acceptance, and pressure to perform as idealised symbols of refugee success. Conclusion: The study highlights the dual character of the Refugee Olympic Team as both a supportive transition space aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 16 and a politically mediated initiative shaped by institutional narratives, structural constraints, and asymmetrical power relations. By integrating ACTM with critical sport-for-development perspectives, this article contributes to scholarship on sport, forced migration, and psychosocial well-being while offering a more explicit psychological interpretation of refugee athletes' adjustment, coping, and career transition experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.