SynthesisFrontiers in oral health2026
Solitary fibrous tumor of the oral cavity: a systematic review of the literature and a new clinicopathologic case report.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm of fibroblastic differentiation, originally described in the pleura and subsequently documented at multiple extrapleural sites. Oral involvement is uncommon and may be diagnostically challenging because of its variable clinical presentation and overlapping spindle-cell morphology. Materials and methods: We report a palatal SFT with clinical, imaging, histopathological and immunohistochemical correlation. In parallel, a systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for studies published between January 2015 and December 2025. Case reports, case series and retrospective clinicopathologic studies describing primary oral SFT were included. Study selection followed PRISMA 2020 recommendations and methodological quality was appraised qualitatively using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools appropriate to each study design. Results: Twelve eligible studies were included, comprising 10 case reports and 2 retrospective series for a total of 30 previously published oral SFTs. Soft-tissue lesions predominated, and the buccal mucosa/cheek was the most common location, followed by the floor of the mouth, tongue, labial mucosa, retromolar pad and intraosseous mandible. Across the reviewed studies, oral SFTs typically presented as slow-growing, well-circumscribed nodules and showed a patternless spindle-cell proliferation in a collagenous to hyalinized stroma with branching staghorn-like vessels. Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 6 (STAT6) was the most informative confirmatory marker, while Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34), B-cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and Cluster of Differentiation 99 (CD99) were supportive but less specific. Most lesions were managed by complete local excision and showed a favorable course. In the present case, diffuse nuclear STAT6 positivity together with CD34, CD99 and BCL2 expression supported the diagnosis of palatal SFT. Conclusion: Oral SFT is an uncommon but distinctive fibroblastic neoplasm that should be included in the differential diagnosis of spindle-cell lesions of the oral cavity. Diagnosis relies on integration of morphology with immunohistochemistry, particularly STAT6. Complete surgical excision with margin assessment remains the cornerstone of treatment, and a risk-adapted long-term follow-up strategy is advisable because rare recurrences may occur, particularly in intraosseous, margin-positive, or proliferatively active tumors. Systematic Review Registration: The systematic review was registered on Prospero with code ID 1358544.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.