Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453373›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Consensus on curriculum design for a person-centred leadership learning programme-a delphi study.

Deborah Jane Baldie, Shaun Cardiff, Kate Sanders, Giselle Cope, Bibi Hølge-Hazelton, Mette Kjerholt, Tanya McCance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deborah Jane BaldieNHS Grampian, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Shaun CardiffFontys Hogescholen, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Kate SandersFoundation of Nursing Studies, London, United Kingdom.
Giselle CopeFoundation of Nursing Studies, London, United Kingdom.
Bibi Hølge-HazeltonSyddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark.
Mette KjerholtSjaellands Universitetshospital Klinisk Biokemisk Afdeling, Roskilde, Denmark.
Tanya McCanceUlster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The creation of person-centred cultures in health care settings is understood as a pre requisite to the provision of person-centred practice. Such cultures need systematic facilitation by health care leaders. While there are few empirically informed theoretical models for person-centred leadership and many organisations internationally, educate leaders in how to transform cultures to become more person-centred, there is lack of consensus on how person-centred leadership can be developed and no high quality, multi-centre evaluations of their effectiveness or impact. Before such evaluations can be undertaken an agreed curriculum is necessary. Only by having this can the fidelity of a leadership programme, subject to evaluation, be maintained. Methods: This study sought to gain international expert consensus on a curriculum for person-centred leadership using a modified Delphi method. Delphi studies employ anonymous and confidential survey methods to ensure expert consensus can be achieved without the interference of influential voices or group coalitions. They typically include two or more rounds with controlled feedback between rounds. We developed curriculum components by undertaking a literature review to identify programmes and theoretical models for person-centred leadership alongside a mapping of current person-centred leadership programmes being delivered by members of an international community of practice committed to the development of person-centred practice. We recruited experts using snowball recruitment. In round 1 we focused on seeking consensus on 16 curriculum components and 6 pedagogical delivery principles and offered the opportunity to comment on the phrasing or clarity of any components or propose additional components. Results: Round 1 resulted in consensus of ≥70% for all components. All bar one had consensus of ≥80%. In round 2 consensus was achieved for all components (≥80% and a mode of 5). Discussion: Using a modified Delphi study approach we have developed an internationally critiqued curriculum framework for person- centred leadership programmes, specific enough to ensure the fidelity of future programme delivery whilst providing sufficient flexibility for appropriate cultural modification within any complex intervention evaluation study. Research is now needed to evaluate the impact of engagement with this curriculum on healthcare leaders' self-views; enacted leadership behaviours and practices; health care cultures and other relevant patient and staff outcomes.

Indexed as

curriculumeducationexpert consensusleadershipperson-centred

Identifiers

PMID42453373
PMCPMC13364922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.