Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453317›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2026

Standards for vision science librarians: 2026 review and revisions.

Heather Edmonds, Karen S Alcorn, Caroline Allen, Rudy Barreras, Dede Rios, Leslie Holland, Thandavarayan Kumaragurupari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather Edmondsedmondsh@neco.edu, Director of Library Services, Library, New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3809-3898
Karen S Alcornkaren.alcorn@mcphs.edu, Reference and Instruction Librarian and Associate Professor, Library and Learning Resources, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Worcester, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-0665
Caroline Allencaroline-allen@uiowa.edu, Health Sciences Librarian, Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1039-8684
Rudy Barrerasrbarreras@westernu.edu, Assessment and Public Relations Librarian, Harriet K. and Philip Pumerantz Library, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-325X
Dede Riosdmrios1@uiwtx.edu, Director of Public Services and Community Health, Nursing, and Mexico Campuses Liaison Librarian, UIW Libraries, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-2656
Leslie Hollandlholland@sco.edu, Director of Library Services, Learning Resource Center, Southern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-4227
Thandavarayan Kumaragurupariaeh_library@aravind.org, Chief Librarian, Aravind Eye Hospital and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-7848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Association of Vision Science Librarians (AVSL) is an international organization composed of professional librarians, or persons acting in that capacity, whose collections include vision-related materials and/or whose patrons include vision scientists. Since 1976, AVSL has defined standards for vision science libraries in all capacities, including optometry, ophthalmology, academia, industry, and beyond. As the most recent Standards for Vision Science Libraries was published in 2014, an AVSL member committee was formed in 2024 to review the Standards and consider what a revision should include. Over the course of several months, committee members collaborated with one another, held discussions with other AVSL members, and reviewed current literature. What resulted is a revised set of Standards that aims to address the significant changes that have taken place not only within the field of librarianship, but with the information needs of the vision science professions as well. These updated Standards place the focus on the librarian rather than the library, as many librarian positions that once focused solely on vision science are now expected to manage several disciplines. The aim of this revision is to serve as a starting point for any librarian working with vision science materials and/or serving vision scientist patrons who wishes to develop their knowledge base and skills in this particular field of health sciences librarianship.

Indexed as

LibrariansLibraries, MedicalLibrary ScienceOphthalmologyHumansOptometryProfessional RoleAssociation of Vision Science Librarians (AVSL)Collection DevelopmentophthalmologyoptometryProfessional CompetenceProfessional Core CompetencyStandardsVision Sciences

Identifiers

PMID42453317
PMCPMC13367308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.