ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026
The Bucharest international European Society for Organ Transplantation consensus on paediatric controlled donation after circulatory determination of death.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foundations for consensus on establishing a unified definition of death: results of the European Society for Organ Transplantation Bucharest International Consensus Conference.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paediatric controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (pcDCDD) is a well described pathway for deceased organ donation, but there has been wide variability in global uptake. There are substantial and differing barriers to pcDCDD across countries, including clinical, legal, and ethical issues. This process utilized a Delphi consensus methodology involving 30 international experts to develop recommendations to guide the development and operation of pcDCDD programs. Two survey rounds evaluated agreement on system requirements, donor identification, medical suitability, communication, end-of-life care, and ante-mortem interventions. Consensus recommendations emphasized the need for robust administrative and legal frameworks that explicitly support pcDCDD, multidisciplinary approaches for donor suitability assessment, and normalization of integrating donation into paediatric end-of-life care. The particularities of obtaining consent for both donation and antemortem interventions necessary for pcDCDD for patients that have never expressed a valid intent to donate were addressed. While our findings demonstrated international variability, strong consensus was obtained for multiple recommendations, suggesting the possibility of developing pcDCDD in varied international settings. The process also highlighted areas of knowledge gaps along the pcDCDD process that would benefit from sustained research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.