ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Mineral biosignature identification from Raman spectroscopy using machine learning.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biosignature detection remains a key challenge in astrobiology, yet robust mineral biosignatures remain limited. Raman spectroscopy is increasingly applied in planetary exploration, but its high-dimensional spectral information has not yet been fully exploited for biosignature discrimination using data-driven approaches. Here, we integrate Raman spectroscopy with interpretable machine learning to distinguish biotic from abiotic apatite, a ubiquitous phosphate mineral in terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. We compile 331 apatite Raman spectra from abiotic and biotic sources and extract 21 band-resolved spectral features. Principal component analysis reveals systematic separation between abiotic and biotic endmembers. A random forest classifier achieves 96.8% accuracy on an independent test set. Robustness is confirmed by multiple validation schemes, including leave-one-source-out cross-validation across 60 independent data sources, indicating that model performance generalizes beyond source- or instrument-specific artifacts. Feature importance identifies two dominant controls: phosphate-band broadening as a structural indicator of disorder and the carbonate-band intensity as a chemical signature of substitution. Density-functional calculations reproduce these features in simulated spectra and indicate that carbonate substitution doubles phosphate-tetrahedral distortion and increases formation energies by two orders of magnitude. Mechanically, higher carbonate contents during biomineral apatite formation reduce crystallinity and broaden Raman bands. We propose that the trained machine-learning model and a two-feature decision map enable the rapid probabilistic discrimination of unknown apatite samples. Our Raman-based machine-learning framework establishes a broadly applicable and mission-relevant strategy for deep-time archives and future planetary missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.