ArticleJBMR plus2026
Development of an automated landmarking tool for the femur in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans using contour-based image analysis.
Article in JBMR plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease that significantly increases fracture risk and imposes a growing public health and economic burden. Notably, hip fractures are associated with high mortality, long-term disability, and loss of independence. When evaluating osteoporosis and estimating fracture risk, DXA is commonly used to determine the BMD. To capture geometrical morphology from these DXA scans as factors in fracture risk prediction, landmarking around the femur is conducted manually around the ROI. However, this process is labor-intensive and prone to variability. This study presents the development of a fully automated femoral landmarking tool that integrates a U-Net convolutional neural network for femur contour segmentation with a geometric algorithm for consistent landmark placement. A heterogeneous dataset of 555 DXA scans was used to train and evaluate the U-Net model, achieving a pixel-wise accuracy of 97.55%, an Intersection over Union of 91.55%, and a Dice coefficient of 95.56% on the test set. When incorporated into a statistical shape and appearance modeling (SSAM) framework for fracture risk prediction, predictions using the automatically generated landmarks achieved a test AUC of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.698-0.965), compared with 0.780 (95% CI: 0.635-0.925) for manual landmarks; a paired DeLong test showed no significant difference (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.