ArticleOrthopedic research and reviews2026
A Bundled-Payment Program is Associated with Improved Access to Platelet Rich Plasma for Treatment of Osteoarthritis in Women and Non-White Population Groups.
Article in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess whether the implementation of a novel hospital-based bundled-payment program affects access to platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) for patients representing different population subgroups. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study, which included patients receiving PRP injections between January 2021 and October 2024, at three outpatient orthopaedic clinics of a single hospital-based institution. Patients were excluded if they did not undergo knee, hip, or shoulder (glenohumeral) PRP injections or had insurance coverage for PRP injections. The main outcome measured was the utilization of the bundled-payment program for PRP injections and treatment failure, defined as need for additional treatment within 9 months. Results: Among 220 patients who received PRP injections, women were more likely to use the bundled-payment program than men (37.76% women vs 18.18% men, p = 0.003). Younger patients more frequently utilized the program (53.26 ± 9.55 years vs 62.02 ± 12.75 years, p < 0.001). Non-white patients were significantly more likely to use the bundled-payment program than white patients (51.61% vs 29.14%, p = 0.014). There were no significant differences in program utilization by ethnicity, DCI, or OA severity. There was no significant difference in odds for requiring additional treatments within 9 months between patients of different racial subgroups. Conclusion: The bundled-payment program was associated with increased access to PRP for non-white patients and women. There was no significant difference between racial subgroups in terms of requiring additional treatments within 9 months after initial PRP treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.