ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of primary care physicians about colon cancer screening tests and referrals in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a major public health concern worldwide, and early detection through screening significantly reduces mortality. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a crucial role in recommending and facilitating colorectal cancer screening. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of PCPs regarding colorectal cancer screening and referral patterns in Saudi Arabia. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing PCP knowledge, attitudes, or practices toward colorectal cancer screening in Saudi Arabia were included. Ten studies comprising 1648 physicians met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed that 98% of physicians recognized the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Colonoscopy was perceived as effective by 93% of physicians, fecal occult blood testing by 86%, flexible sigmoidoscopy by 70%, and CT colonography by 56%. Despite generally positive attitudes toward screening, variability in knowledge and referral practices was observed across studies. Barriers such as lack of awareness of screening guidelines, limited resources, and absence of reminder systems were frequently reported. Overall, while PCPs demonstrate good awareness and positive attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening, gaps remain in practical implementation and referral practices. Strengthening physician training and implementing structured national screening programs may improve adherence to screening guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.